[1]余素 周敬华.急诊血管内支架置入术治疗颈动脉夹层导致急性脑梗死的疗效分析[J].卒中与神经疾病杂志,2020,27(04):517-519.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2020.04.023]
　Yu Su,Zhou Jinghua..The analysis of the effect of emergency endovascular stent implantation on acute cerebral infarction caused by cervical artery dissection[J].Stroke and Nervous Diseases,2020,27(04):517-519.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2020.04.023]
点击复制

急诊血管内支架置入术治疗颈动脉夹层导致急性脑梗死的疗效分析()
分享到：

《卒中与神经疾病》杂志[ISSN:1007-0478/CN:42-1402/R]

卷:
第27卷
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
517-519
栏目:
血管介入术
出版日期:
2020-09-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
The analysis of the effect of emergency endovascular stent implantation on acute cerebral infarction caused by cervical artery dissection
文章编号:
1007-0478(2020)04-0517-04
作者:
余素 周敬华
443003 湖北省宜昌市三峡大学第一临床医学院、宜昌市中心人民医院神经内科[余素 周敬华(通信作者)]
Author(s):
Yu Su;  Zhou Jinghua.
Department of Neurology, Yichang Central People's Hospital, the First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443003
关键词:
血管内支架置入术 颈动脉夹层 急性脑梗死
Keywords:
Endovascular stent implantation Cervical artery dissection Acute cerebral infarction
分类号:
R743.32
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2020.04.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨急诊血管内支架置入术治疗颈动脉夹层导致急性脑梗死的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2015年6月-2019年6月于宜昌市中心人民医院就诊的52例颈动脉夹层导致急性脑梗死患者的临床资料; 入组患者根据治疗方式分为血管内支架置入组(20例)和药物治疗组(32例); 分别记录患者年龄、性别、是否有高血压病、糖尿病等基本情况,比较2组患者颅内出血发生率、脑卒中复发率等情况,并随访其美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)及改良 Rankin量表(mRS)评分及评估血管内支架置入治疗的有效性。结果 2组患者年龄、性别、高血压病、糖尿病、治疗前NIHSS评分比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。血管内支架置入组并发症发生率为30%,高于药物治疗组的18.6%,但2组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。血管内支架置入组治疗7 d后的NIHSS评分为(2.5±3.2)分,90 d后随访mRS 0～2分患者占80%(16/20); 药物治疗组治疗7 d后的NIHSS评分为(5.4±3.5)分,90 d后随访mRS 0～2分患者占50%(16/32),2组比较均有明显差异(P<0.05)。结论 急诊血管内支架置入术可改善颈动脉夹层导致的急性脑梗死患者的近期及远期预后
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of emergency endovascular stent implantation on acute cerebral infarction caused by cervical artery dissection.Methods The clinical data of 52 patients with acute cerebral infarction caused by carotid artery dissection treated in Yichang Central People's Hospital from June 2015 to June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into two groups: stenting group(20 cases)and drug treatment group(32 cases). The age, sex, hypertension and diabetes were recorded respectively. The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and recurrence of stroke were compared between the two groups. The NIHSS score and the modified Rankin Scale(mRS)were followed up to evaluate the effectiveness of endovascular stent implantation.Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, hypertension, diabetes and NIHSS score before treatment(P>0.05). The incidence of complications in the stenting group(30%)was higher than that in the drug treatment group(18.6%), but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The NIHSS score was(2.5±3.2)points after 7 days, The proportion of mRS 0～2 score patients was 80%(16/20)after 90 days in the stenting group, the NIHSS score was(5.4±3.5)points after 7 days and The proportion of mRS 0～2 score patients was 50%(16/32)after 90 days in the drug treatment group, the difference was statistically significant between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Emergency endovascular stent implantation could improve the short-term and long-term prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction caused by cervical artery dissection

参考文献/References:


[1] Engelter ST,Rutgers MP,Hatz F,et al.Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection[J].Stroke,2009,40(12):3772-3776.
[2] Markus HS,Levi C,King A,et al.Antiplatelet therapy vs anticoagulation therapy in cervical artery dissection: the cervical artery dissection in stroke study(CADISS)randomized clinical trial final results[J].JAMA Neurol,2019,76(6):657-664.
[3] Benninger DH,Georgiadis D,Kremer C,et al.Mechanism of ischemic infarct in spontaneous carotid dissection[J].Stroke,2004,35(2):482-485.
[4] Robertson JJ,Koyfman A.Cervical artery dissections: a review[J].J Emerg Med,2016,51(5):508-518.
[5] Peng J,Liu Z,Luo C,et al.Treatment of cervical artery dissection: antithrombotics, thrombolysis, and endovascular therapy[J].Biomed Res Int,2017:3072098.
[6] Engelter ST,Traenka C,Lyrer P.Dissection of cervical and cerebral arteries[J].Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep,2017,17(8):59.
[7] V OV,Dittrich R,Grewe S,et al.The outer arterial wall layers are primarily affected in spontaneous cervical artery dissection[J].Neurology,2011,76(17):1463-1471.
[8] Lekoubou A,Cho TH,Nighoghossian N,et al.Combined intravenous recombinant-tissular plasminogen activator and endovascular treatment of spontaneous occlusive internal carotid dissection with tandem intracranial artery occlusion[J].Eur Neurol,2010,63(4):211-214.
[9] Moon K,Albuquerque FC,Cole T,et al.Stroke prevention by endovascular treatment of carotid and vertebral artery dissections[J].J Neurointerv Surg,2017,9(10):952-957.
[10] Baumgartner RW,Georgiadis D,Nedeltchev K,et al.Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion[J].Stroke,2008,39(2):e27-e28.
[11] Kurre W,Bansemir K,Aguilar Pérez M,et al.Endovascular treatment of acute internal carotid artery dissections: technical considerations, clinical and angiographic outcome[J].Neuroradiology,2016,58(12):1167-1179.
[12] Fisher M.The ischemic penumbra: a new opportunity for neuroprotection[J].Cerebrovasc Dis,2006,21(Suppl 2):64-70.
[13] Takano T,Tian GF,Peng W,et al.Cortical spreading depression causes and coincides with tissue hypoxia[J].Nat Neurosci,2007,10(6):754-762.
[14] Jensen J,Salottolo K,Frei D,et al.Comprehensive analysis of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to cervical artery dissection[J].J Neurointerv Surg,2017,9(7):654-658.
[15] Compagne KCJ,Goldhoorn RB,Uyttenboogaart M,et al.Acute endovascular treatment of patients with ischemic stroke from intracranial large vessel occlusion and extracranial carotid dissection[J].Front Neurol,2019,10:102.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(2019-12-04收稿)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-10