[1]徐幼苗,刘婷婷,张志利,等.CT引导下脉冲射频调节术联合胸椎旁神经阻滞对带状疱疹后神经痛患者疼痛程度及生活质量的影响[J].卒中与神经疾病杂志,2023,30(01):49-54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2023.01.008]
　Xu Youmiao,Liu Tingting,Zhang Zhili,et al.Effects of CT-guided pulse radiofrequency ablation combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block on pain degree and quality of life of patients with postherpetic neuralgia[J].Stroke and Nervous Diseases,2023,30(01):49-54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2023.01.008]
点击复制

CT引导下脉冲射频调节术联合胸椎旁神经阻滞对带状疱疹后神经痛患者疼痛程度及生活质量的影响()
分享到：

《卒中与神经疾病》杂志[ISSN:1007-0478/CN:42-1402/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2023年01期
页码:
49-54
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of CT-guided pulse radiofrequency ablation combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block on pain degree and quality of life of patients with postherpetic neuralgia
文章编号:
1007-0478(2023)01-0049-06
作者:
徐幼苗; 刘婷婷; 张志利; 杨旭; 李丽梅; 刘悦; 王维彬
066000 河北省秦皇岛市第一医院疼痛科[徐幼苗 刘婷婷 张志利(通信作者)杨旭 李丽梅 刘悦 王维彬]
Author(s):
Xu Youmiao;  Liu Tingting;  Zhang Zhili;  et al.
Department of Pain, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao Hebei 066000
关键词:
带状疱疹后神经痛 CT引导下脉冲射频调节术 胸椎旁神经阻滞 疼痛 生活质量
Keywords:
Postherpetic neuralgia CT-guided pulse radiofrequency ablation Parathoracic nerve block Pain Quality of life
分类号:
R747.8
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2023.01.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨CT引导下脉冲射频调节术联合胸椎旁神经阻滞对带状疱疹后神经痛患者疼痛程度及生活质量的影响。方法 选取2019年4月-2021年6月医院疼痛科收治的97例带状疱疹后神经痛患者作为研究对象,随机分为神经阻滞组(n=32)、射频调节组(n=31)和联合组(n=34); 所有患者均接受常规药物治疗,在此基础上神经阻滞组接受胸椎旁神经阻滞治疗,射频调节组接受计算机断层扫描(Computed tomography,CT)引导下脉冲射频调节术治疗,联合组则先行CT引导下脉冲射频调节术,后行胸椎旁神经阻滞治疗; 根据治疗前和治疗8周后患者数字评分量表(Numerical rating scale,NRS)评分降低程度来评价临床疗效; 于治疗前、治疗1、4、8周后采用NRS量表评估疼痛情况,阿森斯失眠量表(Athens insomnia scale,AIS)评估睡眠质量,焦虑自评量表(Self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)和抑郁自评量表(Self-rating depression scale,SDS)评估焦虑和抑郁程度,36项健康调查简表(36-Item short-form,SF-36)评估生活质量; 记录治疗后不良反应发生情况。结果 联合组(97.06%)和射频调节组(90.32%)治疗总有效率均显著大于神经阻滞组(71.88%)(P<0.05); 与治疗前比较,3组治疗1、4、8周后NRS,AIS,SAS和SDS评分显著降低,SF-36评分显著增加(P<0.05); 治疗1、4、8周后联合组NRS,AIS,SAS和SDS评分显著低于神经阻滞组和射频调节组,SF-36评分显著高于神经阻滞组和射频调节组(P<0.05); 治疗1、4、8周后射频调节组NRS,AIS,SAS和SDS评分显著低于神经阻滞组,SF-36评分显著高于神经阻滞组(P<0.05); 3组不良反应发生率比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 CT引导下脉冲射频调节术联合胸椎旁神经阻滞治疗带状疱疹后神经痛疗效显著,有助于减轻患者疼痛程度,改善睡眠质量,减少焦虑和抑郁发生,提高生活质量,且安全性较高,临床可根据实际情况进行选择。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of CT-guided pulse radiofrequency ablation combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block on pain degree and quality of life in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.Methods From April 2019 to June 2021, 97 patients with postherpetic neuralgia admitted to the department of pain were selected as the research objects, and randomly divided into nerve block group(n=32), radiofrequency ablation group(n=31)and combined group(n=34). All patients were treated with conventional drugs. Based in this, the nerve block group was treated with thoracic paravertebral nerve block, the radiofrequency ablation group was treated with CT-guided pulse radiofrequency ablation, and the combined group was treated with CT-guided pulse radiofrequency ablation followed by the procedure of thoracic paravertebral nerve block. The clinical curative effect was evaluated with Numerical Rating Scale(NRS)before treatment, as well as 1 week, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment. Athens Insomnia Scale(AIS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)were used to evaluate sleep quality, the degree of anxiety and depression, respectively. And SF-36 was used to evaluate the quality of life. Adverse effects of treatment were recorded.Results The total effective rates of combined therapy group(97.06%)and radiofrequency therapy group(90.32%)were significantly higher than that of nerve block group(71.88%)(P<0.05). Compared with the baselines, the scores of NRS, AIS, SAS and SDS in the three groups decreased significantly at 1 week, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, and the scores of SF-36 increased significantly(P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of NRS, AIS, SAS and SDS in the combined group were significantly lower than those both in the nerve block group and radiofrequency ablation group, and the scores of SF-36 were significantly higher than those in the nerve block group and radio frequency ablation group(P<0.05). After 1 week, 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment, the scores of NRS, AIS, SAS and SDS in radiofrequency ablation group were significantly lower than those in nerve block group, and the scores of SF-36 were significantly higher than those in nerve block group(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse effects among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion CT-guided pulse radiofrequency ablation combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block is more effective in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia, which is helpful to relieve the pain, improve sleep quality, reduce the occurrence of anxiety and depression, and improve the quality of life. It is safe and can be selected in the clinical practice according to the actual situation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 徐文体,王奇凡.带状疱疹及带状疱疹后神经痛流行病学及经济负担研究进展[J].天津医药,2018,46(5):552-556.
[2] 陈新,廖鹏飞,石强,等.益气活血止痛汤联合高频重复经颅磁刺激对老年带状疱疹后遗神经痛患者疼痛,睡眠质量及近远期疗效的影响[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(17):2174-2178.
[3] Putri MW, Jusuf NK, Yosi A. The impact of pain intensity on quality of Life of postherpetic neuralgia patients[J]. Med Glas(Zenica), 2020, 17(2): 439-444.
[4] Mounsey AL, Matthew LG, Slawson DC. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: prevention and management[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2005, 72(6): 1075-1080.
[5] 覃万翔,石英,崔剑,等.带状疱疹后遗神经痛患者用药依从性及影响因素的横断面调查研究[J].重庆医学,2018,47(8):1084-1086.
[6] 张万云,贺纯静.带状疱疹后神经痛治疗进展[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2019,48(11):710-713.
[7] 张艳茹,封卫征,邵徽英,等.超声引导椎旁神经阻滞治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的疗效及可行性分析[J].影像科学与光化学,2019,37(2):163-168.
[8] 胡鑫,蒋宗滨,何睿林,等.背根神经节脉冲射频治疗老年急性期带状疱疹神经痛的研究[J].实用医学杂志,2020,36(6):779-783.
[9] 带状疱疹后神经痛诊疗共识编写专家组.带状疱疹后神经痛诊疗中国专家共识[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2016,22(3):161-167.
[10] Bulilete O, Leiva A, Rullán M, et al. Efficacy of gabapentin for the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia in patients with acute herpes zoster: A double blind, randomized controlled trial[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(6): e0217335.
[11] 王家双.顽固性带状疱疹后神经痛现代诊疗及研究[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2020,16(3):188-193.
[12] 金雨颖,秦春晖,段宝霖,等.草乌甲素片联合加巴喷丁治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效[J].中华医学杂志,2021,101(43):3575-3580.
[13] 王一皙,陈健.针灸联合微波治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛临床观察[J].实用中医药杂志,2018,34(3):356-357.
[14] 夏焱志,查俊,陈洁梅,等.带状疱疹后神经痛三种治疗方法对比分析[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2018,18(9):674-677.
[15] Dong X, Liu Y, Yang Q, et al. Comparison of therapeutic effects of continuous epidural nerve block combined with drugs on postherpetic neuralgia[J]. Int J Neurosci, 2021, 131(2): 191-195.
[16] 陈杨,蒲勋,肖智,等.带状疱疹及带状疱疹后神经痛病人受累神经分布特点[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2022,28(4):295-298.
[17] Matthews I, Duong M, Parsons VL, et al. Burden of disease from shingles and post-herpetic neuralgia in the over 80 year olds in the UK[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(2): e0229224.
[18] 曹丽.疼痛护理干预对带状疱疹后遗神经痛患者视觉模拟评分及睡眠质量的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(2):309-310.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:河北省医学科学研究课题(20191379)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-20