[1]白新学 张广林 周国平 郭春燕.两种微创手术方案对复发性三叉神经痛患者疗效及安全性的影响[J].卒中与神经疾病杂志,2019,26(03):320-323.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2019.03.013]
　Bai Xinxue*,Zhang Guanglin,Zhou Guoping*,et al.Influence of two kinds of minimally invasive surgical procedures on the clinical efficacy and safety of patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia[J].Stroke and Nervous Diseases,2019,26(03):320-323.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2019.03.013]
点击复制

两种微创手术方案对复发性三叉神经痛患者疗效及安全性的影响()
分享到：

《卒中与神经疾病》杂志[ISSN:1007-0478/CN:42-1402/R]

卷:
第26卷
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
320-323
栏目:
论 著
出版日期:
2019-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influence of two kinds of minimally invasive surgical procedures on the clinical efficacy and safety of patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia
文章编号:
1007-0478(2019)03-0055-05
作者:
白新学 张广林 周国平 郭春燕
473000 河南省南阳市中心医院神经外科(白新学 周国平 郭春燕); 河南省人民医院神经外科(张广林)
Author(s):
Bai Xinxue*;  Zhang Guanglin;  Zhou Guoping*;  et al
Department of Neurosurgery, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang Henan 473000
关键词:
MVD PBC 手术 复发性三叉神经痛
Keywords:
MVD PBC Operation Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia
分类号:
R745.1+1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2019.03.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨MVD和PBC手术对复发性三叉神经痛患者疗效及安全性的影响。方法 选取2016年2月-2018年2月收治复发性三叉神经痛患者共110例,以随机数字表法分为A组(55例)和B组(55例),分别采用MVD和PBC手术治疗,比较2组手术时间、住院时间、临床疗效、复发率及术后并发症发生率。结果 B组手术时间和住院时间均显著少于A组(P<0.05); B组治疗痊愈率显著低于A组(P<0.05); 2组治疗有效率比较无显著性差异(P>0.05); B组术后复发率显著高于A组(P<0.05); B组术后三叉神经抑制反应和面部麻木发生率均显著高于A组(P<0.05); 2组口角疱疹发生率比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 MVD手术治疗复发性三叉神经痛可有效提高总体疗效,降低术后复发风险,并有助于预防相关术后并发症发生,而PBC手术治疗则具有医源性创伤小、操作难度低及术后恢复快等优势。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of MVD and PBC on the clinical efficacy and safety of patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia.Methods 110 patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia were chosen from February 2016 to February 2018 and randomly divided into 2 groups including A group(55 patients)with MVD and B group(55 patients)with PBC,and the operation time, hospitalization time, clinical efficacy, recurrence rate and postoperative complication rate of both groups were compared.Results The operation time and hospitalization time of B group were significantly less than those of A group(P<0.05). The clinical cure rate of B group was significantly lower than that of A group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the clinical effective rate between 2 groups(P>0.05). The recurrence rate of B group was significantly higher than that of A group(P<0.05). The incidence of trigeminal nerve suppression and facial numbness after operation of B group were significantly higher than those of A group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of herpes zoster between 2 groups(P>0.05).Conclusion MVD in the treatment of patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia could efficiently increase overall clinical efficacy, reduce postoperative recurrence risk and be helpful to prevent postoperative complications, but PBC application should possess the advantages including less Iatrogenic trauma, lower operation difficulty and more quickly postoperative recovery process.

参考文献/References:

[1] Ying Xiang, Wang Hao, Deng Shang-hua, et al. Long-term outcome of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia patients elder than 80 years A STROBE-compliant article[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(39):e8199.
[2] Wu M, Fu X, Ji Y, et al. Microvascular decompression for classical trigeminal neuralgia caused by venous compression:novel anatomical classifications and surgical strategy[J]. World Neurosurgy, 2018, 113(5):e707.
[3] Liao Chen-long, Zhang Wen-chuan, Yang Min, et al. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia:the role of mechanical allodynia[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2016, 91(6):468-472.
[4] 刘红旗,尤蔚.三叉神经痛[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2016:112-113.
[5] 赵继宗.神经外科学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:512-516.
[6] Neto N, Maia J, Rolim DD, et al. 206 percutaneous balloon compression as treatment to trigeminal neuralgia:14 years of experience in a single center[J]. Neurosurgery, 2017, 64(suppl 1):256.
[7] Wiggins A, Lonie M, Pimentil I, et al. Electromagnetic neuronavigation for the percutaneous treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with balloon compression:technical note and cadaveric validation study[J]. Acta Neurochirurgica, 2018, 160(7):1337-1341.
[8] Maarbierg S, DISG, Bendtsen L, et al. Trigeminal neuralgiadiagnosis and Cephalalgia,2017,37(7):648-657.
[9] Li Fu-yong, Ma Yi, Zou Jian-jun, et al. Endovascular treatment of rare vascular complications of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Turkish Neurosurgery, 2016, 26(2):215-218.
[10] Liu Peng-fei, Zhong Wen-xiang, Liao Chen-long, et al. The role of percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation for persistent or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after surgery[J]. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2016, 27(8):E752-E755.
[11] Shi Lei, Gu Xiao-yan, Sun Guan, et al. After microvascular decompression to treat trigeminal neuralgia, both immediate pain relief and recurrence rates are higher in patients with arterial compression than with venous compression[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(27):44819-44823.
[12] Wang Yi, Zhang Shi-zhen, Wang Wei, et al. Gamma knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia in cases with previous microvascular decompression[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2018, 110(2):E593-E598.
[13] Hussain M, Konteas A, Sunderland G, et al. Re-exploration of Microvascular Decompression in recurrent trigeminal neuralgia and intra-operative management options[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2018, 29(5):1102-1107.
[14] Zhang Xin, Zhao Hua, Tang Yin-da, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of reoperation, percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation when microvascular decompression of trigeminal neuralgia is invalid[J]. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2016, 27(7):E688-E690.
[15] Xu W, Jiang C, Yu C, et al. Percutaneous balloon compression for persistent or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression:personal experience of 28 patients[J]. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 2017, 255(6):1-6.
[16] Asplund P, Blomstedt P, Bergenheim T A. Percutaneous balloon compression vs percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 71(2):E562.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-25